The UK Supreme Court has begun hearing a case for the distribution of gender-neutral passports, as brought forward by non-gendered person, Christie Elan-Cane. Elan-Cane, who uses per/perself pronouns, first requested a passport without an ‘M’ or ‘F’ marker in 1995, and has campaigned for gender-neutral passports ever since.

Christie Elan-Cane

Per previous attempts to add a third option to passports were unsuccessful after the Home Office’s Court of Appeal said the current regulations are not unlawful. During the most recent hearing, Elan-Cane’s barrister, Kate Gallafent, said: “There is nothing controversial per se about having a passport where the sex is unspecified…The appellant has a right to live as a non-binary, or more particularly a non-gendered, person.”

Gallafent also pointed out that a handful of other countries, such as India and Pakistan, allow for more than two gender options on passports. 20 US states have also introduced gender-neutral passports. The case is now due to continue, with Elan-Cane arguing that it is discriminatory for the Home Office to refuse to offer passports with an ‘X’ marker.

Share this post

Written by

Comments

Trans congresswoman Sarah McBride condemns Trump’s  anti-trans military ban in powerful speech

Trans congresswoman Sarah McBride condemns Trump’s anti-trans military ban in powerful speech

By Graham Robson 1 min read