"They’re trying to use the law to take away our visibility.” Queer Scout hits back as Scouting America launches lawsuit
Scouting America - the organisation formerly known as the Boy Scouts of America - has launched legal action against an Arizona-based LGBTQ-owned travel company called Queer Scout, claiming trademark dilution and alleged brand confusion.
The lawsuit, filed in late February, accuses Queer Scout of “diluting Boy Scouts’ famous trademarks and falsely associating with Boy Scouts,” according to court documents reported by The Arizona Republic. The company, which specialises in curated travel experiences for LGBTQ+ adults in Medellín, Colombia, uses a distinctive pink fox logo. Scouting America argues that the travel firm’s name and animal imagery bear too close a resemblance to its own branding and activities, allegedly offering “similar” services and prominently featuring animal figures in its marketing.
The case comes as Scouting America faces renewed political scrutiny from the Trump administration. Earlier in February, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell warned publicly that the organisation was “on the clock” after supposedly embracing “social justice, gender-fluid ideological stances,” adding that continued federal partnership would require “common-sense, core value reforms”. Days later, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth criticised the organisation for being “gravely wounded” by its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, claiming it had “agreed” to restrict membership based “solely on biological sex”.
Against that backdrop, Queer Scout founder Sam Holdren suggested the timing of the lawsuit raises deeper questions. He said that while his business is a small, LGBTQ-owned travel company for adults, Scouting America’s legal move could reflect broader political pressure rather than genuine consumer confusion.
“When you combine that timing with the fact that hundreds of businesses have used the word ‘scout’, it starts to look less like consumer confusion and more like something broader involving identity and visibility,” Holdren told The Arizona Republic. “We’re a small LGBTQ-owned travel company for adults, and our name clearly signals we’re not affiliated with Scouting America”.
The dispute is not entirely new. Queer Scout first sought to trademark its name in 2004, but the application was opposed by the Boy Scouts, according to reports. Holdren’s legal team even offered to clarify that the company targets LGBTQ adults, but Scouting America rejected the proposal.
Holdren argues the matter extends far beyond intellectual property.
“This is about whether we can express ourselves freely in the marketplace. They’re trying to use the law to silence us and take away our visibility,” he said.
Scouting America denies that its lawsuit is connected to political or Pentagon pressure, insisting the case is purely about protecting trademark rights and preventing consumer confusion. A spokesperson described it as an issue of “trademark [and] intellectual property, nothing more”.
Support independent LGBTQ+ journalism
Scene was founded in Brighton in 1993, at a time when news stories about Pride protests were considered radical. Since then, Scene has remained proudly independent, building a platform for queer voices. Every subscription helps us to report on the stories that matter to LGBTQ+ people across the UK and beyond.
Your support funds our journalists and contributes to Pride Community Foundation’s grant-making and policy work.
Subscribe today
Comments ()